Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 50

Thread: FMICs: Stock versus Aftermarket

              
   
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    877
    Rep Points
    442.1
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    9 out of 15 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No

    FMICs: Stock versus Aftermarket

    This post by JoshBoody is hidden due to excessive negative ratings. Click expand to view the post.


    Attached Images Attached Images   

  2. #ADS

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    417
    Rep Points
    866.5
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Very informative, I love my Helix FMIC.

  4. #3
    E90Company's Avatar
    E90Company is offline Member
    Status: VCG/VANOS
     
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tallahassee FL
    Posts
    1,122
    Rep Points
    1,200.1
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    This is half the story. I'd like to see the WGDC's as well

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,076
    Rep Points
    972.8
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    IATs aren't the entire story with an FMIC either. The flow rate and pressure drop of the various aftermarket FMICs are key as well. The Helix, just on that stepped design isn't conducive to good flow characteristics.

  6. #5
    dzenno@PTF's Avatar
    dzenno@PTF is offline Supporting Vendor
    Status: www.protuningfreaks.com
     

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    6,222
    Rep Points
    2,406.1
    Mentioned
    191 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    25


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I won't make fun of your boost curves but I'll make fun of that terrible scaling Click here to enlarge depending how far away the nozzles are the wet bulb effect is only really a topic for theoretical debates which on the forums usually don't go very well as you know
    Click here to enlargeCobb ProTune & eTune Services
    Contact us on the Web, Blog, Facebook, Twitter
    Google Talk: dzenno@protuningfreaks.com


    N54 6MT TwinTurbo 1/4 Mile World Record: 11.43@126.6mph, 1.8 60', Stock 6MT 3.08 Gearing (Cayuga - Toronto Motorsports Park)
    N54 6MT TwinTurbo 60-130mph World Record: 6.5sec 100-200km/hr, 7.5sec 60-130mph (vbox verified)
    N54 DCT World Record (Race Gas + Meth + SSP Clutches), Stock Turbos: 450WHP / 490WTQ
    N54 (ACN 91 octane only) World Record, Stock Motor: 573WHP / 537WTQ
    N54 (96-98 octane, no meth) World Record,
    Stock Motor: 673WHP / 564WTQ
    N54 (ERC 109 unleaded octane and meth) World Record, Stock Motor:
    725WHP / 609WTQ
    Contact us today for our forum promotions on our COBB PRO Tunes and offerings from ar design, Aquamist, AMS Performance, COBB, cp-e, Evolution Racewerks,
    ETS, HELIX, Howerton Engineering, KW Suspensions, P3 Cars, ST Suspensions, SPEC

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    877
    Rep Points
    442.1
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by themyst Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    IATs aren't the entire story with an FMIC either. The flow rate and pressure drop of the various aftermarket FMICs are key as well. The Helix, just on that stepped design isn't conducive to good flow characteristics.
    I have shown data on this with AMS versus Helix pertaining to WGDC. I tried to take some sampling in this case but tough to match weather and boost exactly... I didn't set out to test this... above was just taken from already gathered data. Plus at lowish boost its difficult to see the differences... I didn't turn up boost until after Helix install.

  8. #7
    DavidV's Avatar
    DavidV is online now Member
    Status: New HPFP. Really helps :)
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,360
    Rep Points
    5,389.3
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    54


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JoshBoody Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Depending on the new turbo rep points I get, I’ll post some more threads of random info I’ve learned.
    This Click here to enlarge
    I think this is not what the meaning of the contest is all about.
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,173
    Rep Points
    790.3
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I just want to say, any decent intercooler is going to lower charge temps on the top end and thus drive up WGDC. While back pressure factors into this, the air density effect will be the primary driver of WGDC on the top end in gears 3 or higher. I don't think you will see a huge difference between most ICs tbh. Maybe a few degrees and a few % WGDC.

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,669
    Rep Points
    1,231.5
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by themyst Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    IATs aren't the entire story with an FMIC either. The flow rate and pressure drop of the various aftermarket FMICs are key as well. The Helix, just on that stepped design isn't conducive to good flow characteristics.
    That is a decent guess, but I bet there is no data to support the pressure drop being higher, and even if it is higher, is it high enough to shadow the benefits of the superior cooling benefits of Helix.

  11. #10
    Sticky's Avatar
    Sticky is offline Regular User
    Status: BoostAddict.com Alpha testing
     

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    94,535
    Rep Points
    22,005.2
    Mentioned
    1301 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    221


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Not sure why a few people didn't like your post, gave you some rep op.

  12. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    877
    Rep Points
    442.1
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DavidV Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This Click here to enlarge
    I think this is not what the meaning of the contest is all about.
    Its a good reason to post stuff that takes effort. Maybe instead of playing golf today i would create some threads.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Not sure why a few people didn't like your post, gave you some rep op.
    I think others think like DavidV. Hopefully if someone disagreed with the content they would post why, instead of ninja negs.

  13. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,076
    Rep Points
    972.8
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    10


    Reputation: Yes | No
    If it makes you feel any better I didn't neg rep you.

  14. #13
    DavidV's Avatar
    DavidV is online now Member
    Status: New HPFP. Really helps :)
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,360
    Rep Points
    5,389.3
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    54


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JoshBoody Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think others think like DavidV.
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by themyst Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If it makes you feel any better I didn't neg rep you.
    For the record, I didn't neg rep you either.
    But my point is that if I would only make posts here if I expected to be repped I would post a lot less and the forum would be a lot quieter then it is now.
    Normally you make/create posts/treads to inform, humor, entertain, discuss.
    Not primarily to expect rep points.
    And certainly not with a condition that you will only post more information if you get positive rep points.
    Just my .02
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  15. #14
    rader1's Avatar
    rader1 is offline Member
    Status: A change in the weather...
     
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Roanoke VA
    Posts
    1,394
    Rep Points
    1,471.4
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I think anyone bringing technical data and discussion to the forum deserves + rep, even if you don't agree with them. It could be a very bad situation if people stop posting data because of neg rep they fear they may receive from some of the more opinionated(and rep blessed) members.
    Click here to enlarge
    Click here to enlarge

  16. #15
    Sticky's Avatar
    Sticky is offline Regular User
    Status: BoostAddict.com Alpha testing
     

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    94,535
    Rep Points
    22,005.2
    Mentioned
    1301 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    221


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DavidV Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    For the record, I didn't neg rep you either.
    But my point is that if I would only make posts here if I expected to be repped I would post a lot less and the forum would be a lot quieter then it is now.
    Normally you make/create posts/treads to inform, humor, entertain, discuss.
    Not primarily to expect rep points.
    And certainly not with a condition that you will only post more information if you get positive rep points.
    Just my .02
    It's fine, during the contest some will post just for rep. The idea is to encourage posting/activity anyway. So, it's working.

  17. #16
    DavidV's Avatar
    DavidV is online now Member
    Status: New HPFP. Really helps :)
     

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,360
    Rep Points
    5,389.3
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    54


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's fine, during the contest some will post just for rep. The idea is to encourage posting/activity anyway. So, it's working.
    I respect that, and also expected it.
    But he specifically added a condition to add useful information based on the rep points he would receive.
    That part I didn't like.
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  18. #17
    Sticky's Avatar
    Sticky is offline Regular User
    Status: BoostAddict.com Alpha testing
     

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    94,535
    Rep Points
    22,005.2
    Mentioned
    1301 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    221


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DavidV Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    But he specifically added a condition to add useful information based on the rep points he would receive.
    That part I didn't like.
    Agreed, neither did I, and it seems he got some negs due to it.

  19. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    N.C. U.S.A
    Posts
    279
    Rep Points
    750.7
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    8


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    I neged him. Did not like the rep point for additional info request.
    Kevin
    2011 335is 7DCT/JB4 G5-ISO BMS Flash
    2013 135is 6MT - JB4 G5-ISO
    FF Cobra Mk-IV work in progress

  20. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    877
    Rep Points
    442.1
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Ha, the thread has been hidden... Cool.


    Had some good threads planned too:
    ATR tuning including boost control (with PID, which i experimented with last week), some charting of req/actual loads and how it relates to boost, how to keep boost more steady with higher IATs, throttle mapping, etc.
    For stacking some of the nuances in throttle, VANOS, ign/AFR mapping, fueling when your base map is a lower load target then the output.
    And what I'm most interested in... results of aftermarket DPs with exact same tuning parameters.
    Installed the ER sport oil cooler last week and could give a brief review with oil temp data soon.


    Anyway its fun posting information like this when there's an interest, but i take it some of the cool BB peeps don't care to see my data/experiences... I'll never be one of the cool people here.


    I'll stick with being a lurker and the occasional comment when i can.


    The data i have gathered over the years is useful to me, but why take the time to post it if its not appreciated. On this forum some of the satisfaction is rep points, which have always been scarse for me... even though i do post useful info most of the time along with the occasional opinion, or argument with DZ or Sticky (which can be informative also). But i guess the mention abouts reps earlier is more due to my rep history. I think the hidden OP is more uncool me then the mention of reps.

  21. #20
    Sticky's Avatar
    Sticky is offline Regular User
    Status: BoostAddict.com Alpha testing
     

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    94,535
    Rep Points
    22,005.2
    Mentioned
    1301 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    221


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by JoshBoody Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Anyway its fun posting information like this when there's an interest, but i take it some of the cool BB peeps don't care to see my data/experiences... I'll never be one of the cool people here.
    I think it's a matter of how you go about wording your post. Just try to contribute without a deliberate rep fishing angle and there would be no issue. Your past likely plays into it was well.

  22. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago Burbs
    Posts
    1,787
    Rep Points
    1,039.2
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11


    2 out of 3 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Here is some testing I did with my last car inline with this discussion.

    There are 4 logs of runs to 110+mph when it was 93 degrees and humid.

    Mods
    Stage One Cobb 93 octane
    AR Catless DPs
    Helix FMIC
    DCI

    Intake temps for each pull started at 107, 115, 125 and 135 for each.

    Total time for all four pulls were completed in 3 mins 2 seconds to see how she held up with some hot intake temps. The last is the WGDC included for all WOOTs of the run.
    Attached Images Attached Images      
    2015 - m4 or 991 Turbo S - hopefully
    2011 - 335is e92 - Cobb PTF E40/Rob Beck/AR/Helix (458 rwtq and 479 rwhp - @ 17 psi and 6,000 rpms)
    2007 - 911 Turbo - EP1/AMS (617 awtq and 500 awhp) - Retired
    2008 - 335i e92 - Cobb/AR/Helix/OSS (384 rwtq and 356 rwhp) - Retired
    2003 and 2005 330i/ci zhp - Stock - Retired

  23. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,669
    Rep Points
    1,231.5
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Some people just hate data, figures, math etc. In the end all that matters is love anyways I guess... I stopped posting data and facts.

  24. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    584
    Rep Points
    596.2
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    'You don't have enough reputation ( 1000 ) to view this.'

    This is ridiculous.
    LEMANS BLUE M-TECH E92->PROCEDE REV3::ETS 7" FMIC::RACELAND DPS::WAVETRAC DIFF::DEFIV DIFF LOCKDOWN::DEFIV OCC::DEFIV INTAKE::RB PCV

  25. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago Burbs
    Posts
    1,787
    Rep Points
    1,039.2
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Ha, rough crowd. I thought this info useful as I had collected for my own purposes.
    2015 - m4 or 991 Turbo S - hopefully
    2011 - 335is e92 - Cobb PTF E40/Rob Beck/AR/Helix (458 rwtq and 479 rwhp - @ 17 psi and 6,000 rpms)
    2007 - 911 Turbo - EP1/AMS (617 awtq and 500 awhp) - Retired
    2008 - 335i e92 - Cobb/AR/Helix/OSS (384 rwtq and 356 rwhp) - Retired
    2003 and 2005 330i/ci zhp - Stock - Retired

  26. #25
    Sticky's Avatar
    Sticky is offline Regular User
    Status: BoostAddict.com Alpha testing
     

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    94,535
    Rep Points
    22,005.2
    Mentioned
    1301 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    221


    0 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by uniter Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    'You don't have enough reputation ( 1000 ) to view this.'

    This is ridiculous.
    Here is what you are missing:

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Josh boody
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Recently had my turbos replaced under the 82k warranty, so I went through some of the modding stages again... below I compiled some of the IAT logs between ICs. Very clear that an upgraded IC is important. I do think there’s a pretty big difference between aftermarket options and I have shown this before based on my experiences… specifically between Helix and AMS.

    Why is an “aftermarket” IC important. Of course temp for spark timing… lower IAT, less chance for detonation, and more timing advance putting you closer to MBT. If running E85 and/or meth, timing is not so important since the octane will allow a proper timing curve, BUT:

    E85: apart from the tuning aspect (DME IAT compensation), IATs effect oxygen density. Lower the temp, higher the density, more O2 = more power. Someone else can do the math on 20, 30deg which is significant.

    Meth (post-IC): People see their IATs on Meth and think no need for an IC. What they are seeing is NOT the true IAT. Meth cools the air, but not to the degree that’s seen in the logs. IAT sensor output is a false reading due to “wet bulb effect”. How much is it false, I can’t say. I can say that the apprx IAT % increase you see off meth is also happening on meth. There’s NO heat soak suppression with Meth… you just can’t see it in the log. The IC is heak soaking at the same rate on/off meth. Meth temp decrease from evaporation is a %... so final IAT depends on the temp post IC… doesn't matter what the IAT sensor is reading.

    Anyway, to the logs. Very simply I chose randomish logs with Helix and stock IC. The tuning in these comparisons is relatively close… lowish boost around 14, 15psi mid-range to 13ish at 6k rpms. Some of the runs are while moving, some after a stop light with static heat… some back to back… basically random. All OFF meth of course.

    Depending on the new turbo rep points I get, I’ll post some more threads of random info I’ve learned. Maybe ATR tuning, specifics on stacking, other stuff. Tomorrow I may run out and do some virtual logs to compile pre/post DP install… that should be interesting. Have some good ones pre-DP. But we’ll see if the reps are worth the effort…

    ps. don't make fun of some of the boost curves... I was dialing in the new turbos. Wasn't so easy after having very loose WGs.


    If you like it rep him not me.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •